E1
A Texas man is convicted of robbery when forensic experts see what they want to see in the analysis of store surveillance footage.
E2
The limits of forensic science are exposed when flawed blood spatter evidence leads to the conviction of a Texas woman for the murder of her husband
E3
Assumptions pass for facts when Detroit police misuse cadaver dogs to build a murder case against a man whose daughter has disappeared
E4
In Brooklyn, an innocent man faces assault charges thanks to statistical DNA testing that that relies on deduction rather than proof